Feb 25
Visitors Mourn Maymont Bears

More than 300 mourners gathered at noon today to say their tearful goodbye to two black bears who delighted visitors
to Maymont Park for a decade. The bears were euthanized this week after one of them bit a child. The child and a parent had breached a wooden fence to enter a restricted area in an apparent attempt to feed the bears an apple.
The event was organized by a local woman who loved the bears and Maymont Park, and who wanted to do something to honor the bears’ existence. A few Maymont veterinarians to whom the bears were members of their family fought back tears of their own as they addressed the crowd about the events of the past week.
The community has been expressing its outrage over the decision to put the bears down so that rabies tests could be performed. Brain tissue is required to test for rabies, which requires that the animal be killed: both bears tested negative for the virus.
Visitors this afternoon talked about watching the bears frolick in the sunshine and expressed their shock and dismay about the decision, which was made following several hours of deliberation among 14 experts including doctors, veterinarians, public health and wildlife officials from the state, the City of Richmond and Maymont itself.
Some brought stuffed animals — mostly teddy bears — and left them at a display wall outside the bear habitat. One person brought a jumbo-sized Winnie the Pooh.
Others brought flowers, even favorite photos of the two bears. Children who had visited the bears with their parents brought homemade cards and drawings.
Others, children and adults alike, signed large posters and cards with messages like, “We’ll miss you.” They talked with each other about their memories of visiting the bears with their families over the years.
Still others came to take in the scene of the empty exhibit,
their sadness too deep to express with anything other than silent tears.
Mixed in with that sadness and shock is anger. Anger that’s directed at the unidentified parent that apparently put the child in harm’s way despite two signs on the very fence from which the child reached through that read, “WILD ANIMALS ARE DANGEROUS. DO NOT FEED.” Anger that’s directed towards the officials who made the decision to euthanize the bears rather than simply making the child undergo the standard rabies vaccination. And anger at this morning’s revelation that the remains of the bears were buried in an area landfill rather than on the park grounds.
(The burial was done before the test results were known, and because Maymont Park is city property, the bears could not have been buried there because of public health concerns if either animal had tested positive. Also, Maymont did not own the bears: they were merely licensed to display them by Virginia’s Game and Inland Fisheries Department.)
Richmond Mayor (and former Virginia Governor) Doug Wilder has promised a full investigation of what he has called “one of the most reprehensible
as well as senseless things to have occurred.” He also said that the city would investigate whether the parent — whom officials refuse to name — might face any criminal charges, including negligence and trespassing.
“The Maymont facility is to attract kids to have an appreciation for wildlife…to show how animals are our friends,” Wilder said at a Friday afternoon press conference. “And this is how we reward our friends.”
As the investigation continues, I hope that the public won’t take their frustrations out on Maymont: it is clear from talking to the various workers at Maymont that that the entire staff is devastated by the situation, as much, if not more so than the many visitors to whom the bears brought such joy.
(All photos, except the shot of the two bears, taken by the author.)
Don’t forget to take the sidebar poll: How would you have handled the incident?








February 26th, 2006 at 4:57 am
I don’t know that my family and I would have seen you at the vigil, since we were running quite late, but I appreciated this post and the pictures. (And now I’m all curious as to which station you work for. But, as is my habit, I digress.) FYI, I’ve linked your piece from my own post of this morning, which you may read if you like: Teaching Moments: On the Deaths of Maymont’s Bears.
Best regards (and good luck with your novel!) - Victoria
February 27th, 2006 at 4:05 am
I can’t help but be angry at the stupidity of the unidentified parent. What where they thinking?!?! But moreover…in this day and age, why do we still need to KILL animals to test for rabies? It reminds me of the old way they used to conduct pregnancy tests where a rabbit had to die. That is no longer the case (just go buy EPT at the local drug store). So what about rabies??? Isn’t it about time there was some kind of medical advance in that area???
March 1st, 2006 at 9:07 am
Why aren’t the animals vaccinated for rabies? And if they are why where they killed?
March 1st, 2006 at 9:09 am
Why aren’t the animals vaccinated for rabies? And if they are why where they killed?
It has been explained to me that there is no vaccine against rabies that has been developed for bears. As I understand it, there is a vaccine for horses, and one of the park’s volunteers who conducts carriage rides tells me that Maymont’s horses are vaccinated.
March 1st, 2006 at 6:16 pm
What a darn shame that the bears were killed! It makes me sick to think that two beautiful animals were destroyed based on one incident. This is not to say that I do not feel badly for the child, because I do. However, bears are wild and wild things bite.
Where in the world was that childs Mother?
Stunned,
T
March 4th, 2006 at 7:05 am
Hello…my name is Crystal, I organized the vigil in this post and that’s my bear sign above (with the 2 plush bears on it). Thank you so much for this post! I also started a website to honor Buster and Baby as well as to give people another forum to talk about it all…www.maymontbears.com. I’ll see you at the memorial today…thank you again.