Home » Discrimination, Hot-Button Issues, News & Media, Politics, Racism

Politics and the Race Card

5 May 2007 4 Comments

In the Charleston City Paper, columnist Barney Blakeney wrote an article about a black Charleston native, Dudley Gregorie, who is challenging longtime Mayor Joe Riley in the November, 2008 election.

Blakeney, who is also black, points out that Riley spent almost one million bucks on his last campaign, and that his challenger, Dudley Gergorie, admits that he doesn’t have pockets that deep. He points out that Gregorie is the third black candidate to run against Riley in the past dozen years and is expecting support from the local black community. He then says this:

“And after some 330 years, the city is certainly due a black mayor.”

Due?

It is statements like this that make me shake my head in frustration when it comes to racism. I have no problem voting for a black man for mayor. Or for Congress. Or for the White House.

But before I vote for anyone, I’m going to listen to the candidates and find out what they want to do. I will back wholeheartedly the person whose plans best mesh with that I’d like to see happen. What will be missing from the equation when I step into the voting booth will be concern over what color he or she happens to be.

It’s outrageous to take on the mindset that because we haven’t had a black mayor, we should vote for this person to correct that “wrong.” I think there’s something wrong with allowing race to be the determining factor. What happened to picking the best man or woman for the job? What happened to treating people equally regardless of their race?

Blakeney points out the lack of affordable housing in the Charleston peninsula, one of several problems that he says has ticked off voters during the Riley years, as a reason black voters should consider one of their own. He then looks back at the past two black candidates whose total votes indicate that not all black voters voted black. Are they supposed to?

I wouldn’t vote for Mayor Riley because he’s white. Am I supposed to?

The city is “due” a mayor who the voters feel presents the best platform for everyone in Charleston.

I think it’s going to be a long road to next November.

4 Comments »

  • imabug said:

    I had pretty much the exact same thoughts when I was reading that article last night.

  • Wil said:

    In a similar spirit I remind you to include a “None of the Above” choice in your surveys.

  • Patrick said:

    I actually did consider a “None of the Above” option this time, but I deleted it at the last minute because I wanted to focus specifically on the candidates who were featured in the debate.

    While there is no guarantee that one of them will be the one, it seems most likely so far. But there’s always time for a new survey between now and then!

  • Taylor said:

    There was a Will and Grace episode along these same lines. Grace was supporting a candidate because she was a woman, only to find out that she was also a crazy racist. And will was supporting a gay guy, only to find out he was a communist or something like that.

    I think the same problem is going to happen in the Democratic primary elections- people will vote for Obama or Hilary only because they are minorities, and they aren’t paying attention to wether or not they are actually the best candidates. As much as I would love to see a black president (or mayor), it is absolutely crazy to vote for someone because of that qualification only.

    To say that any candidate is “due” is a mockery of our election process.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.