There is a battle over hair that is keeping two Lowcountry teens out of school. You’ve probably heard about this story by now, because it is getting national attention. But just in case you haven’t, here’s the gist:
The two teens recently had five-pointed stars and words like “Jack Town” shaved into their hair. Their school suspended them, saying that they are prohibited from wearing their hair in that style because those markings are gang indicators. Their father says he didn’t give his children permission to cut their hair that way, but says they have a right to wear their hair any way they want.
The school district says the students are welcome to return…as soon as they remove the “offending” symbols. Their father says that isn’t going to happen.
Meanwhile, the teens are prohibited from attending school. At least one of them says he wants to get back to school.
But the hairstyle, apparently, seems more of a priority than getting the education.
At the risk of being called a “conformist,” I’ll have to point out that while we live in a country that values individual freedom, we also live in a country in which some freedoms are curtailed universally in the interest of safety.
For example, when I drive back home, there are portions of I-26 in which the speed limit is 70 miles per hour. I can drive 70 miles per hour. There might be days when I think I should be able to push it up to 80. Or 90. But the law says I can go 70. I have a spotless driving record. The guy who’s behind me, already tailgating too closely, could have a spotted driving history, and even be paying the outrageous rates of SR-22 insurance after a DUI arrest. He gets to go 70 as well.
On one hand, it seems unfair: I’m the good driver, so I should be able to drive any way I please. This lunatic behind me should be restricted to driving a golf cart that never moves faster than about 20 miles an hour. But we both get the same set of rules, and the rule is there to keep as many people safe as possible.
The school district involved in this hair-raising battle should have every right to set dress codes that do not encourage any kind of gang activity. Whether these two kids have ever even considered joining a gang — they say they are not involved in gangs in any way — doesn’t matter. The rules are the same for everyone. And if that happens to interfere with the fashion statement two students who aren’t gang members want to make while it prevents people who are in gangs from using the same symbols to make a very different statement, I think the school is reasonable for making the policy.
There’s such a thing as picking one’s battles.
What’s more important? An education, or a hairstyle?
I think we all know the answer.