Jul 24
It’s ‘Have,’ Not ‘Of’
Everyone repeat after me: should have, would have, could have. It’s have, not of. If you type “should of,” “would of” or “could of” instead of “should have,” “would have” or “could have,” you deserve to lose a finger. At the very least.




(4.50 out of 5)





July 25th, 2008 at 8:58 am
Yes. Thank you.
…standing by with a hatchet
July 25th, 2008 at 9:00 am
I’d like to request a pass for shoulda/woulda/coulda, but only in proper dialect/context. Otherwise, completely ron the spot, sir.
July 25th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Yep. You’ve hit upon one of my biggest pet peeves. Anyone who uses the phrase “could of” or “should of” has simply never thought about what the words they say actually mean. All too common in our society today, I am afraid.