The Baptism Battle
Last night, I received a knock at the door from two young women who wanted to discuss a new bible study class with me. I won’t go into detail about the denomination these ladies represented, but their main mantra, it seems, is that everyone should focus solely on the word of God.
No “watering down” of God’s intentions. No playing around with words when someone is in the wrong. They think that when it comes to sin, you should call a spade a spade right away. Lots of churches refuse to do this, the leader of the two said, because they want to keep people who drive the big BMWs walking in the door and shelling out their offerings.
A somewhat offensive view of churches, I thought, especially since it seems to take the position that any church that doesn’t do things their way has to be wrong. That’s pretty big talk.
She gave an interesting example that she kept going back to: Christ’s teachings about water baptism. A lot of churches, she said, don’t over-emphasize the importance of water baptism. They instead suggest, she says, that as long as you accept Christ’s salvation with all your heart, being baptized is the less important component of the process.
She stopped to ask if I had been baptized. I had. Twenty-five years ago, to be exact. She then asked if I had accepted Christ as my savior. I had. As part of the same process. She then suggested that anyone who hasn’t been baptized can’t really be going to heaven.
I raised a counter-example of my own to that one. I recalled a sermon I’d heard many years ago, in which the pastor asked whether or not someone could live an entire life outside of God’s will, then, on their deathbed, realize how wrong they were and accept Christ and still get to heaven. The responses from the congregation were mixed. The pastor answered his own question: “Yes he can. The catch is, none of us know when that deathbed is coming, or if we’ll even have time at the end to contemplate such a decision.”
I stopped short of that answer, giving just the opening example:
“Let’s say there’s a man who refuses to accept God at every turn. He lives his whole life without God in his life. On his deathbed, he has a dramatic realization that he has been wrong, and genuinely, sincerely accepts Christ as his Savior just before he dies. If it was truly a genuine, sincere acceptance, is he not going to go to heaven?”
Their answer, which, oddly enough, took a bit of time to get to, is that God would have allowed him the opportunity to be baptized so that his sins would be washed away. Apparently, this would be extra time suddenly tacked on to the man’s normal, predestined lifetime, so that the matter of water baptism could be accomplished. At least, that’s the only meaning I can get from what she was saying: if you’re on your deathbed, the implication is that your time is almost up. For God to suddenly “allow the opportunity” for a baptism, it would seem, would be him giving you a little extra time on the clock to accomplish this last mission. Otherwise, there would have to be a certain point during one’s lifetime, when it literally is too late to accept Christ, and that seems to go against the story of a God who gave his only Son so that everyone would have the same chance for salvation.
They asked me what I thought. I wasted no time hemming and hawing around the issue: I believe that God would know what was in the man’s heart, and would bring him into heaven based on that, even if he wasn’t baptized. While I think that God’s word is God’s word, though often subject to radically different interpretations, God Himself is the only one who is actually allowed to interpret that word and always be right. Even if the Bible says this man should or must be baptized before his place in heaven is guaranteed, God and God alone has the power to make the final decision, no matter what we may say, in a judgmental way, about whether this man has “done enough.”
The woman explained that there would have to be a water baptism. Then she actually said, “How else would his sins be washed away?”
The “washing away” of one’s sins is symbolic. You can look inside a baptismal pool after someone has been baptized and you won’t find a lot of “sins” floating around in the water. Baptism is supposed to be a public declaration of one’s faith, not a quick wash job.
How else can one’s sins be washed away? By the grace of God. Through whom, the bible also says, all things are possible.
This is not to say, of course, that being baptized isn’t important and should be ignored. I do believe that believers should be baptized and that baptism is a valid part of the process. I do not believe, however, that we Christians should be so obsessed about this one detail that we miss the bigger point of God’s salvation and should place ourselves in a position to speak to what God would do with “extenuating circumstances” when that’s something that only God can know for sure.
I don’t think I’ll be attending this group’s bible study. Not because I have a fancy BMW and a lot of money to place in the offering plate, but because I want to focus on the real point of living the life God wants us to live, rather than getting lost in details that I don’t think are the “deal-breakers” some are so determined to make them out to be.
The God I worship is a God who loves us all, no matter how far we stray from Him and wants a personal relationship with every single one of us. The God I worship loves us all for who He made us to be. I don’t worship a God who spend all of His time trying to trap us on technicalities.













Hmmm. Sounds like the church I was raised in, although I never knew them to send people out two by two.
You’ve got a good handle on the theology, so I wouldn’t worry too much. If it’s not baptism, it’s something else being held too tightly as MANDATORY for being saved. Whatever
Jesus’ command at the end of Matthew is to “go to all the world… baptizing” – so it’s more of a command for the church, right?
Just go flinging water on everyone if it’s that important and literal. And the passage with “be baptized FOR the remission of sins” is usually taken as a mis-translation. “FOR” there in the original can likely mean “BECAUSE OF” not “CAUSING” – which fits into what you’ve learned that it’s symbolic of what has already happened in the heart.
Wow, you are a kinder person by far than I am. I’d've just said I had a church and if pressed would have added that the God I worship has a bigger heart for forgiveness than the God they’re worshipping. Also, lighten up.
Did you know that (supposedly) Jeffrey Dahmer converted not long before he was murdered in prison? It’s an interesting theological argument to have with someone about whether he “got in” to heaven….
Very interesting post. I completely agree with the symbolism of baptism and while I agree it is important, I don’t think it’s a deal breaker with God if you otherwise accept Jesus. I think that’s why I always got hung up on the Baptist church. They required immersion and did not accept the ‘sprinkling’ as Baptism as I received which was separate from accepting Christ and joining the church for me. Of course, that is one thing that distinguishes the Baptist denomination so that is fine to have that requirement, but didn’t change the fact that I believed I had already been Baptized.
I was Christened as an infant, asked the Lord to come into my heart around age 8, and officially joined the church around 14. For me, they were three separate events instead of all in one.
The technicality trap door–can you imagine standing before God and God sounding a buzzer and opening the door below our feet if we miss a point?
Those ladies would have an issue with the malefactor on the cross whom Jesus pardoned and said that he’d be with Jesus in paradise that day.
I don’t think God will contradict scripture about any “musts,” however, seeing that His word won’t pass away (Matthew 24:35, Numbers 23:19). But He certainly is the only one who can interpret scripture without error.
Thank God for the cleansing of our sins by Jesus’ blood and not a subsequent work by man.
Leave your response!
About Me
Patrick is a television producer, writer, Mac lover, and Christian, though not necessarily in that order. He has a natural dislike of double standards and poor grammar.
Upcoming Posts
Polls
My Twitterstream
1 day ago from Patrick's Place
2 days ago from web
2 days ago from TweetDeck
2 days ago from TweetDeck
3 days ago from web
Browse By Popular Topics
Television Saturday Six Politics Sunday Seven Humor Blogging Religion News & Media Memes Personal Health Celebrities CBS Writing & Publishing Internet Mind Boggling Customer Service Children Out There Advertising Crime Holidays Double Standards Discrimination NBC Memorial Election 2008 YouTube Pet Peeves Government Technology Hot-Button Issues Diet Arch-a-thon God-time AOL Game Shows Language Homosexuality Racism Best Of Grammar Consumer Friends Patrick's Place Poll Schools Economy Dogs Speaking Out Photography Movies Spam Weather War in Iraq Books Monday's Morals ABC WordPress Decency Cable Religion Run Amok Comments Animals Pets Twitter Food & Drink The Price is Right Environment Military Money Reality Shows Breaking News Tuesday Two Anxiety & Depression 9/11 Telephone Facebook Conspiracy Theories Marriage Mac Election 2004 iPhone Random 10 Devotions Debt Newspapers Richmond Hurricanes Election Authors Fiction Patriotism Abortion 100 Days of Integrity Fox Blogger Terrorism CNN Relationships TV Land Charleston Drugs Health Care Charity Sports Soap Operas Music Upfronts Horror Fiction Hurricane Katrina Alcohol Photo Challenge Driving Porn GSN Digital Television Bob Barker Walter Cronkite Fox News War on Christmas Turning 40 South Bay Earthquakes Maymont Star Trek Charleston 9 Citizen Journalism Patrick's 100 Year in Review Syndication Copyright The Andy Griffith Show Breastfeeding Zesto Election 2012 The CW Better Blogging Immigration MSNBC Cemetery Confederacy Death Penalty Vivi Awards HBO PBS
-- Powered by Category Cloud
Archives
Meta
Subscribe via Feedblitz
Recent Comments
Month’s Top Commenters
Tags
Local Blogs
The Credits
Copyright ©2004-2010 Patrick K. Phillips
All Rights Reserved.
Some images, videos and excerpts appear through Fair Use and are not intended as a challenge to copyright or ownership. The inclusion of videos from YouTube are provided as Fair Use and within the terms of YouTube's copyright policies, which specify that the party uploading the content and authorizing embedding in other sites either holds the copyright for that material or has obtained permission to do so. Certain images have been licensed through iStockphoto.com, Stockfresh.com and the Hemera Clip Art Collection.
Recent Posts
Most Commented
Popular This Week
Bad Behavior has blocked 852 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia theme by Michael Hutagalung