Jul 31 2008

Comment, Please?

Tag: Comments, Language, SpamPatrick @ 1:55 pm

No, this isn’t some lame attempt just to get some comments:  actually, I just want to make sure that the latest spam-catcher that I installed in the background isn’t blocking anyone.  So please say hello.  Comment moderation is still on, so your comment won’t necessarily appear immediately, but you should get a notice that your comment is in the moderation queue.

By the way, ever notice how strange the word queue looks spelled out?  I had to do a double-take just to make sure I hadn’t spelled it wrong.

Strange language, English.

UPDATE:  Because of comment spammers, I’m closing comments for this particular post.  Thanks to those who were willing to help me test out comment moderation.  Now that it’s clear that it is working, there’s no need to keep this one open.


Jul 27 2008

Triple-Ply

Tag: Comments, SpamPatrick @ 7:58 am

I now have a third layer of spam protection up and running.  This newest layer is supposed to determine whether a “spambot” is attempting to imitate a real live human being.  I’ve run a few test comments to make sure that “normal” comments are getting through, and I haven’t encountered any problems, yet.

The second layer of spam protection has a growing list of buzzwords that will prompt a Captcha test — one of those annoying “Type these letters” tests that forces you to transcribe words from a graphic — to make sure you’re really you.  I apologize if you get hit with one of those, but I am trying to hit as many of the spambots’ keywords as I can while still trying to make it easy for you to get through without any problem.

Yesterday’s Saturday Six didn’t seem to be affected, but if you post a comment and it won’t let you through, please click the Contact tab at the top of the header and send me a quick private message to let me know.


Jul 24 2008

Why Would a Christian Dating Site Spam My Blog?

Tag: Blogging, Comments, SpamPatrick @ 6:51 pm

I’ve been quietly battling a surge in spam behind the scenes here at Patrick’s Place.  Many of the spam comments (that you never see because of two layers of comment moderation) come from the same email address, which I am working on blocking completely.

The target URL of about half of them lately has been a dating site for Christians.  I’m not going to say which one, of course, because that’s what the spammers want.  No dice.

Ironically, one of the spam comments said something about gay dating, and the link was to the same site.  That’s going a long way to make a point.

The actual site, in case you were suddenly wondering, in no way deals with anything gay…which is a little odd when you think about it:  there are gay Christians in the world.

If I may borrow that all-too-familiar phrase, what would Jesus do when it comes to spam?  I don’t think he’d be a spammer:  he’d be a commenter who’d say who he was and what he wanted without wasting time sending thousands of little messages that point to someone else’s site.  And I suspect if Christ had his own blog, he’d have a spam filter like you couldn’t imagine.

UPDATE:  I’m closing comments on this particular post, because other dating sites keep leaving spam comments and I’m tired of dealing with them.


Jul 09 2008

Then There’s This…

Tag: Humor, SpamPatrick @ 1:22 pm

By coincidence, after I posted the piece about the error-filled email this morning, my dad forwarded me a different email “alert.” This one begins with the typical, “sorry to do this but this time it’s really justified” line, then moves right on to the alert.

Considering the gravity of what it said, I figured that I should share it at once, lest such a terrible thing happen to you:

If someone comes to your front door saying they are checking for ticks due to the warm weather, and asks you to take your clothes off and dance around with your arms up,

DO NOT DO IT!! THIS IS A SCAM!!

They only want to see you naked.


I wish I’d gotten this yesterday - I feel so stupid.

Yeah, my dad has a twisted sense of humor.


Jul 09 2008

The Statue

There’s an email circulating that starts off with another of those typical “the media won’t tell you this” lines. In this particular case, the accusation is that the story “doesn’t have the shock effect.”

But as usual, there’s a little more to it than that…something that the “they” who composed this email really don’t want you to know.

The story centers on a statue of an American soldier, apparently grieving at the loss of a fellow soldier and being comforted by a young child. According to the email, the statue, which will eventually be shipped from Iraq to a military museum in Texas, was created by an Iraqi artist named Kalat.

This Kalat, the story goes, had suffered the torturous existence of being forced by Saddam Hussein to make “many hundreds of bronze busts of Saddam that dotted Baghdad.” The email then reports that Kalat was so grateful for “the Americans [sic] liberation of his country” that he melted three of the busts to create this memorial to fallen American soldiers and worked on the statue for many months.

Out of the goodness of his heart.

The email then asks and answers its own question:

“Do you know why we don’t hear about this in the news? Because it is heart warming and praise worthy. The media avoids it because it does not have the shock effect.”

Or so “they” want you to believe…while they deliver this little call to action: “But we can do something about it. We can pass this along to as many people as we can in honor of all our brave military who are making a difference.”

A quick visit to myth-busting website snopes.com, which, curiously enough, is the kind of place these self-appointed media-condemning “truth” spreaders never seem to bother to go, tells a somewhat different story about this Kalat and his artistic creation.

The website declares it a case of “real photograph, inaccurate description:”

“…the accompanying text is very misleading. The Iraqi sculptor was not ‘forced by Saddam Hussein to make the many hundreds of bronze busts of Saddam,’ he did not produce the memorial shown because he was ‘so grateful that the Americans liberated his country,’ and the monument was not his idea. Members of the U.S. Army paid the sculptor, who had previously worked on a few other Saddam statues, to create the work pictured according to a design of their choosing.”

And believe me, the tall tale only gets better — or worse, depending on your point of view — from there. Why did this Kalat really agree to build the statue, and how does he really feel about American soldiers? Read it for yourself…but be warned: the “they” who created this email certainly don’t want you to know!

I certainly have no problem with “supporting the troops” and honoring the men and women of our military. But there’s a big difference between paying tribute and spreading propaganda.

What’s on their agenda? What are they trying to get you to believe, despite what the apparent facts are? And why would they make false accusations while demanding the “whole” truth?

Why won’t the media really report this story? Maybe because it’s inaccurate, exaggerated and just plain false. Sometimes the media does gets it right.


May 31 2008

Fighting Spam…Part 2,842

Tag: Blogging, Spam, WordPressPatrick @ 6:29 pm

I have added one additional weapon in the arsenal against spam here at Patrick’s Place.  It’s an extra plugin that will require comments it deems as “questionable” to be validated with a captcha function.

Captcha is that system that shows distorted letters or numbers and requires a user to type what they see.  But wait…it’s not as bad as you think!! 

It will only require you to do so if it sees something in your comment that it thinks might be spam.  So for those of you who normally comment, you should have no problem at all.  If it does think something is amiss, it’ll give you the additional test, and then your comment should make it to my moderation cue.  And in most cases, I’m fairly quick about moderating comments.

I’ve added this for two reasons:

First, I have discovered recently that some perfectly legitimate comments from perfectly real people were being thrown into the spam filter for reasons that didn’t seem clear to me.  Normally, this wouldn’t be a big deal, because I could just click over and scan through the crap and pick out the good ones.

Second, the amount of crap piling up in the spam filter has reached an unmanageable point.   I had to scan through 21 pages of spam comments — more than 1000 individual pieces of spam, with any number of “interesting” references to various body parts, just to salvage 2 legitimate comments.

Sorry, kids…that’s just no fun.

If you leave a comment and it gets flagged and you have to do the captcha thing, I apologize in advance.  I hope that the system will quickly recognize you so that you don’t have to do it a second time.  If you think you’re not getting through, click the Contact tab at the top of the blog and send me a note — that goes just to me, not as a published comment.

Hopefully, this will make sure that you get through quicker and that spambots don’t.


May 31 2008

What A Mighty Big ‘Tude You Have

Tag: Blogging, Customer Service, SpamPatrick @ 12:32 am

I was doing a Google search for a plug-in option that would further assist my spam filter so that I could weed out spambots without having literally hundreds of suspected spam comments to sift through to make sure no legitimate comments were misdirected.

I came across a website with a plug-in that wasn’t really what I was looking for, anyway, but I couldn’t help but notice the big bold message at the top of the page:

“This plugin project is on hold. Why? Because hundreds of people asked for this plugin, so we created it. However, when we asked for donations to fund further development we gathered a whopping $20. So, it seems that while people are chomping at the bit to make money with our code almost none are willing to share their revenue by making a reasonable donation. Therefore we give the existing code away only to those that deserve it. For the rest of you, write the code yourselves.”

Wow. So somebody is surprised that in this day and age, a large number of people want something for nothing? Particularly when many of Wordpress’s users don’t pay a cent for Wordpress itself?

I wonder if they get that “asking for donations” is like asking for a favor, and that a request, or even a plea or demand, does not force someone else to hand over a donation. A donation, the last time I checked, refers to something that is given voluntarily, usually in the form of a gift. There may be a moral obligation that some people feel, but if it’s voluntary, it’s a little unfair to get bent out of shape if everyone chooses not to take part.

We do live in a lazy world, after all. And with gas prices about a dime away from the $4.00 mark, we’re beginning to live in a stingy one, too.

There’s no question in my mind that this this person made a very wise decision in limiting access to the product…especially if there’s that much anger that donations haven’t rolled in faster. But with a message like that, I can’t admit that I’d feel generous enough to make myself one of the “deserving,” either.

More power to ‘em.


Jan 17 2008

Bad Move

Tag: Customer Service, SpamPatrick @ 8:42 am

There was an email from the “new” AT&T this morning that made me a strange offer:  if I move now, I can take my AT&T service with me and they’ll waive the $40 connection fee normally charged for moving service.

The offer expires on April 1.

This is one of the most ridiculous offers I’ve ever seen:  if I were moving anywhere, it would be, at best, a great coincidence that I’ be able to take them up on their offer.  And with the housing market the way it is, I suspect that there aren’t nearly as many people jumping from home to home right now, unless you count the move of some to the “poor house.”

But since I’m not moving anywhere at the moment, and likely not before April, I’m left to wonder if they really expect me to take on the expense of finding a different place to live, either in terms of a down payment or deposit, hiring a moving van, etc., just to save their $40 connection fee.

How about a month of free service?  Or let me use this little offer like a “Get out of Jail Free” card for when I do decide to move.

Everyone could use that.  Which is probably exactly the reason it wasn’t offered.


Jan 14 2008

The ‘Real’ Obama?

Tag: Election 2008, Internet, Politics, SpamPatrick @ 4:07 am

The emails almost always begin one of two ways: either, “Is this true?” or, “Why hasn’t the media reported the truth about Obama?”

In other words, people either think we haven’t heard of it and want us to look into it for them, or they have already decided that it must be true and because we don’t make mention of it in every single newscast we put on the air, we must be engaging in some sort of conspiracy of silence to keep this “critical” information from the public.

They concern two widely-circulated chain emails about Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama. One of them contains a lot of allegations about Obama himself while the other is a very negative portrayal of Obama’s church.

But let’s look at the “truth” of the emails.

In the first, everything from his parents to his middle name to his “real” intentions are suggested:

“Who is Barack Obama?

Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita, Kansas.

Obama’s parents met at the University of Hawaii. When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. Hi s father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia.?
When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocate to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school.

Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim.
He is quick to point out that, “He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school.”

Obama’s political handlers are attempting to make it appear that
that he is not a radical.

Obama’s introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son’s education.

Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta.

Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world. Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran.

Barack Hussein Obama will NOT recite the Pledge of Allegiance nor will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama turns his back to the flag and slouches.

Let us all remain alert concerning Obama’s expected presidential candidacy.
The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!!”

This email also mentions that the writer — who’s always anonymous – “even checked with Snopes.com,” then reports that it is factual. “Check it out for yourself,” it challenges, likely hoping that those who receive it will just take the writer’s word for it instead.

Bad move. Because those who do take the time to visit snopes.com quickly discover that this email is labeled false by the myth-busting site.

The fact that the words Muslim and atheist are typed in all caps clearly indicates that the email originates from a religious activist; this could be a sign that a right-wing evangelical is behind the email. In any case, it calls into question the background of the writer and suggests that there is religious discrimination at work.

The mention of Obama’s middle name, Hussein, is a similar attack, because it focuses more attention on his religious background. Hussein is a common name in Arabic countries. Kenya, his father’s country of origin, happens to be an Islamic country. To a rational person who wants to vote based on issues, a candidate’s name should mean nothing, as long as it can be found on the ballot.

According to FactCheck.org, CNN debunked the part about Obama attending a radical Wahabi school, when it sent a reporter inside to see whether Obama’s elementary school really taught radical religious extremism. It didn’t.

It also points out that it was Democratic House Member Keith Ellison of Minnesota, the first and only Muslim member of Congress, who was sworn into office with his hand on a Koran instead of a Bible. Barack Obama used his own Bible, a fact so easily checked and confirmed from newspaper accounts and photographs.

The bit about the Pledge of Allegiance, which sometimes is the sole focus of another chain email, involves a photo published in Time magazine that shows Barack Obama not holding his hand over his heart during the singing of the national anthem, not the recitation of the pledge.

Then there’s the email about Obama’s church, which starts off by explaining that Obama mentioned the church of which he is a member on Oprah. Well if Oprah is involved, then it must be true!

The facts it claims to have found about the church are deemed “very alarming:”

“Barack Obama is a member of this church and is running for President of the U.S. If you look at the first page of their web site, you will learn that this congregation has a non-negotiable commitment to Africa. No where is AMERICA even mentioned. Notice too, what color you will need to be if you should want to join Obama’s church…_ B-L-A-C-K!!!_ Doesn’t look like his choice of religion has improved much over his (former?) Muslim upbringing. Are you aware that Obama’s middle name is Mohammed? Strip away his nice looks, the big smile and smooth talk and what do you get? Certainly a racist, as plainly defined by the stated position of his church! And possibly a covert worshiper of the Muslim faith, even today. This guy desires to rule over America while his loyalty is totally vested in a Black Africa!”

The email then adds, “I cannot believe this has not been all over the TV and newspapers.”

Perhaps the writer should have stopped to think that there might be a reason this “truth” wasn’t being reported: because it is anything but.

This one doesn’t even get his much-publicized middle name right. And it doesn’t get much better from there.

The church does describe itself as “unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian.” Personally, I think it’s a shame that a black Christian should think he would need to be ashamed or apologize for it, but maybe that’s just me. In any case, the church’s website indicates a commitment to educate blacks. But it is not a “blacks-only” — or should that be “B-L-A-C-K-S-only” — church.

FactCheck.org quotes Theology Professor Martin Marty of the University of Chicago Divinity School, who is white, who says he and his wife attend occasionally, and “like all other non-blacks, are enthusiastically welcomed.”

As FactCheck correctly points out, there is a big difference between a black church that is “pro-black,” as this church seems to be, and one that is “anti-white,” which it seems not to be. If it were “anti-white,” one might expect Obama himself, whose mother is white, to have been rejected from the moment he stepped foot inside.

No one, not one of the people who want to demand “answers” about why the media is “hiding” the alleged facts of these emails, would be satisfied with a media report that contained this many errors and exaggerations. Yet an email full of allegations appears and people eat it up like a rich dessert.

Politics should be about issues, not attacks based on lies. I hope whoever is spreading this crap is exposed. We have much more important things to worry about.


Jan 10 2008

Not That Kind of Comment

Tag: Blogger, Internet, SpamPatrick @ 2:08 pm

Most bloggers will tell you that it’s always nice to get comments.  Well, that’s true, unless the comments are spam, pointing to porn sites or credit card scams or other dubious stops along the Information Super-highway.

I logged on while at lunch today and saw that I had 4 comments waiting for moderator approval.  Wouldn’t you know it:  all four were spam.

They love me, they really love me.   The feeling is not mutual, so I’ve activated an additional spam filter that Wordpress offers.  We’ll see how it works.

In the meantime, if you don’t have a porn site and aren’t trying to lure people into some fraudulent scam, feel free to say hello.


Oct 30 2007

Before You Forward…

Tag: Blogging, Internet, SpamPatrick @ 8:41 am

A local blogger, Josh of Floss Regularly, says he was fooled by a dreaded email forward about a live deer that had been supposedly caught in the ocean off Charleston Harbor.

Upon doing a little research, he discovered that the email wasn’t entirely correct: the deer had actually been caught offshore from Virginia, not Charleston.

He says:

“Never trust a President’s PR photographers, and never, never trust an email that says ‘fwd’ on it.”

That’s good advice, because you never know where these emails really begin.  Gotta love the internet.

I’ve found, working in the media, that when a viewer sends a forwarded email to a newsroom, almost always accompanied with an attitude of disgust or impatience demanding to know why we haven’t covered this “big” event, there’s almost always something about the email that isn’t quite right.

If you’ve never visited Snopes.com, you should.  It’s the first place you should go when you receive a forwarded email that you actually start believing.  Snopes basically is a database for such emails, and it fact-checks them all.  Some are true, some are false, and some, like the deer story, are somewhere in between.

I take what is probably an unreasonable bit of enjoyment in politely referring the more rude emailers to the site when they send us something we’ve “missed” (with inappropriate amounts of condescending attitude) when it turns out that the little email they’ve become so convinced is true…isn’t.


Dec 23 2006

Searching for the Key?

Tag: Blogging, SpamPatrick @ 11:22 am

I’ve noticed something recently that I’m suddenly seeing more and more. When I visit a blog that has been abandoned by its original owner and whose address has been “captured” by spam businesses, I’m met with a screen that consists a blow-up of one of the word verification graphics. It’s pictured to the right.

It makes me wonder whether those little automated spambots that leave those comments filled with links to porn sites and viagra sites may have figured out a way to capture those twisted-word graphics, create a way to specifically identify one from the others, then ask for your unwitting help by giving them the answer to the “riddle.”

I’m not about to answer their little question. Would you?


Dec 22 2006

The Year in Spam

Tag: Humor, SpamPatrick @ 11:25 am

I received this from a friend and thought I’d post it here:

I must send my thanks to whomever sent me the one about rat poop in the glue on envelopes because I now have to use a wet towel with every envelope that needs sealing. Also, now I have to scrub the top of every can I open for the same reason.

I no longer have any savings because I gave it to a sick girl (Penny Brown) who is about to die in the hospital for the 1,387,258th time.

I no longer have any money at all, but that will change once I receive the $15,000 that Bill Gates/Microsoft and AOL are sending me for participating in their special e-mail program.

I no longer worry about my soul because I have 363,214 angels looking out for me, and St. Theresa’s novena has granted my every wish.

I no longer eat KFC because their chickens are actually horrible mutant freaks with no eyes or feathers.

I no longer use cancer-causing deodorants even though I smell like a water buffalo on a hot day

Thanks to you, I have learned that my prayers only get answered if I forward an email to seven of my friends and make a wish within five minutes.

Because of your concern I no longer drink Coca Cola because it can remove toilet stains.

I no longer can buy gasoline without taking a man along to watch the car so a serial killer won’t crawl in my back seat when I’m pumping gas.

I no longer drink Pepsi or Dr Pepper since the people who make these products are atheists who refuse to put “Under God” on their cans.

I no longer use Saran wrap in the microwave because it causes cancer.

And thanks for letting me know I can’t boil a cup of water in the microwave anymore because it will blow up in my face…disfiguring me for life.

I no longer check the coin return on pay phones because I could be pricked with a needle infected with AIDS.

I no longer go to shopping malls because someone will drug me with a perfume sample and rob me.

I no longer receive packages from UPS or FedEx since they are actually Al Qaeda in disguise.

I no longer shop at Target since they are French and don’t support our American troops or the Salvation Army.

I no longer answer the phone because someone will ask me to dial a number for which I will get a phone bill with calls to Jamaica, Uganda, Singapore, and Uzbekistan.

I no longer have any sneakers — but that will change once I receive my free replacement pair from Nike.

I no longer buy expensive cookies from Neiman Marcus since I now have their recipe.

Thanks to you, I can’t use anyone’s toilet but mine because a big brown African spider is lurking under the seat to cause me instant death when it bites my butt.

Thank you, too, for all the endless advice Andy Rooney has given us. I can live a better life now because he’s told us how to fix everything.

And thanks to your great advice, I can’t ever pick up $5.00 I dropped in the parking lot because it probably was placed there by a sex molester waiting underneath my car to grab my leg.

Oh, and don’t forget this one either! I can no longer drive my car because I can’t buy gas from certain gas companies!

If you don’t send this e-mail to at least 144,000 people in the next 70 minutes, a large dove with diarrhea will land on your head at 5:00 PM this afternoon and the fleas from 12 camels will infest your back, causing you to grow a hairy hump. I know this will occur because it actually happened to a friend of my next-door neighbor’s ex-mother-in-law’s second husband’s
cousin’s beautician…

Have a wonderful day….

By the way, a South American scientist from Argentina, after a lengthy study, has discovered that people with insufficient brain and physical activity read their e-mail with their hand on the mouse. Don’t bother taking it off now, it’s too late.

I’m sure a lot of those “warnings” were familiar. The “stolen FedEx uniforms” spam was the most recent one to arrive in my inbox. (It has been proven false.)

But listed all together like this, it’s quite a testament to our general gullability, isn’t it?


Dec 19 2006

Back to the Squiggles

Tag: Blogging, SpamPatrick @ 7:04 pm

Believe me: the last thing I want to do is discourage anyone who wants to comment. I’d like for you to comment as often as you wish, assuming it’s on-topic and relevant. (And even if it isn’t on-topic, I might work it in one way or another.)

But for about a week or so, I’m brining back the little “word verification” option, which requires commenters to enter a series of letters from a twisted graphic that “spambots” cannot “see.”

The last time I did this, spambots seemed to drop this blog off of their radar for a while. They came back, but I had at least a brief respite from them. I’m hoping I can repeat that little feat.

In particular, they’ve been very active for the past month. It’s odd that only certain posts seem to be attracting them, which leads me to believe that somewhere, they’re looking for “most-linked posts” or something like that.

A perfect example came today, when this appeared:

“Hey all,
What are the content rules, if any, for posting erotic poems?”

It was followed by a hyperlink which, of course, I’m not running.

The content rules here are simple: if you leave me a comment that makes sense, is relevant and reasonable, I’ll probably run it. If you leave me a comment that does nothing more than promote a site that has nothing to do with the topic of the post, or if you leave me a comment that is basically a press release promoting a published work that does relate to the topic of the post, I’m not going to run it. I don’t do commercials here unless you pay me, and you couldn’t afford a slot on my rate card; if you could, you wouldn’t be spamming blogs.

The only other rule I have is directed to those spambots: you are hereby required to generate a electromagnetic pulse in your originating PC powerful enough to destroy the computer on which your programming was written and unleashed on the rest of us.

That oughta do it.

In any case, I’ll turn word verification on for a week or so, and I’ll let you know if anything changes when I turn it back off. Keep your fingers crossed, and keep the comments coming!


Nov 29 2006

Check Your Links!

Tag: Blogging, Internet, SpamPatrick @ 10:41 pm

One of the nice things about building relationships with fellow bloggers is the notion of blogroll links, those listings of other blogs down the sidebars of other people’s blogs. Each time you stumble upon a new blog, if you like it, you might tend to enjoy some of the blogs that writer visits regularly.

There’s the potential, in blogrolls, to point your readers to blogs you feel are also deserving of their attention; and there’s the potential to get your writing more exposure.

Unfortunately, there’s also the potential for hackers to gain access to blogs that have either been shut down or had their security compromised and delete all content in favor of explicit content.

Shelly of The View from Here alerted me to the fact that one of the blogs I had in my sidebar over at A Stop at Willoughby had suffered such a fate. When I clicked that link, I was met with a variety of explicit photos of various body parts and sex acts. I’ve heard from the blogger who owned that URL — at least until hackers commandeered it — and he has given me an updated address, and the link has been updated.

The moral of this story, which I’m cross-posting at ‘Willoughby,’ is to check your sidebar links to make sure that they are still pointing to the blogs you think they are. You might have an unpleasant surprise waiting for a reader that you wouldn’t want them to see!

And thanks to Shelly for making us all aware of this unfortunate new hacker villainy.


Next Page »


Bad Behavior has blocked 2205 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Cancer Prevention