Sep 29 2008
I’m Sick of the Word Precondition
When he’s not trying to make it out like he single-handedly saved the world by suspending his campaign — where was Palin and why didn’t she step up? — to solve the economic crisis, he’s making a big deal about Obama’s previous statements that he’d be willing to meet with foreign leaders without precondition.
First, and let me get this one out of the way, if McCain has all of the answers about the nation’s economic ills, I wonder why he felt the need to suspend the campaign and “rush” back to Washington to begin with: why didn’t he take care of these issues while they were still merely possibilities? Why did it have to go this far before he took action? Isn’t fending off problems before they happen part of leadership?
As for the whole precondition debate, I’d love it if we could never hear this word again.
I wish our candidates for the Oval Office would just drop it. It’s a pointless debate: whether the president himself or one of his representatives further down the chain of command meets with someone without setting specific requirements or not, a meeting without precondition will have already happened. So what real difference does who conducts the meeting actually make?
And if the president is supposed to be our chief representatives to other countries, then shouldn’t he have the option — even if he never, ever uses it — to make such a meeting in a crisis?
Let’s go back to Hillary’s famous 3am phone call scenario. A crisis happens. A quick decision has to be made. The president needs to make contact with a foreign leader. What do you prefer to have happen: a series of meetings between lower-level people with preconditions that have to be met before the process can move forward so that people in the next level up can then get together, working their way up to a meeting of the two leaders; or our president getting the other nation’s leader on the phone in whatever manner it takes to resolve a crisis before it escalates to something worse?
And let me save you some time: if you believe that in a crisis, preconditions should be thrown out of the window in favor of solving a problem with as small a cost as possible, then the whole argument over preconditions goes right out the window with it. If you’re for preconditions sometimes, then you’re obviously not against them all of the time, so why engage in such a pointless argument?
It’s not an example of the naivate of a would-be president who says preconditions may not be imposed; it’s an example of the naivate of voters who’d allow themselves to be fooled by an obvious smokescreen that blinds us to the real problems in the world.
Like the economy, stupid.


I like almost every kind of music. If you were to browse my iTunes library or my iPod, you’d find everything from Classical to Pop to Jazz and almost everything in between. I’m not a fan of country per se, but I have a couple of country-ish songs somewhere in there. I’m not a fan of rap at all, and I think it’s probably the only genre that isn’t represented.








