Regular Doses of Common Sense™

Media Bias Accusations Don’t Exactly Tell Whole Story

16.11K 23
Media Bias Accusations Don’t Exactly Tell Whole Story

Have you heard of the Pearl River, MS shooting? An interesting meme on Facebook the other day used the incident as a way to accuse the media of bias.

It’s amusing to me how easily some people can be swayed by any argument that paints the media as being biased. But I find it sad how little research they’ll do on those claims. I saw an interesting little meme making its way around Facebook the other day, one of those familiar little graphics that accuse the media of being biased against gun owners.

This one featured white text on a black background with a photo that presumably depicts the person about whom the meme is focused. The text reads as follows:

“Ever heard of the Pearl River, MS shooting?
Probably not.

This 16-year-old kid was stopped by Asst. Principal Joel Myrick and his .45 pistol retrieved from his car.

Did the Gun-Free Zone stop this nut? Nope.

Did an armed citizen with a .45? Yep.

Will you hear this in the mainstream media? Nope.

Frankly, because I work in the media, I’ve learned that any time an accusation includes something about, “the media will never report this,” there’s a reason for that.

This case is no different.

I’ll admit it, though: if I didn’t know about that red flag, I’d definitely be curious to know why we aren’t reporting a story about a school administrator rushing in to stop a student before he could kill any classmates.

No matter how “anti-gun” you believe the media is, it’s a no-brainer that a story of a student bringing a gun to school itself would be enough to get coverage. Add to that the fact that an assistant principal rushed into the scene with a gun of his own and prevented a bloodbath and you’ve got a story that no reasonable news outlet would refuse to cover.

Therefore, there has to be more to this story than this little accusation is leading us to believe.

There always is.

I checked the news wires, wondering how we didn’t have this in that night’s newscasts. Sure enough, there was no mention of the story.

That’s odd.

So I Googled it.

And I found the whole story.

Beginning with the fact that there seems to be confusion over where this happened: though the Pearl River runs through Pearl, Mississippi, Pearl River and Pearl are two different communities. This shooting happened in Pearl, not Pearl River. So much for accuracy in reporting.

More importantly, this isn’t a breaking news story. Unless you consider “breaking news” to refer to something that happened 16 years ago. Yes, it was 1997 when that 16-year-old — who gun enthusiasts would no doubt describe as “a bad guy with a gun” — was stopped by his assistant principal, the “good guy with a gun.”

To be honest with you, off the top of my head, I can’t recall any gun related story from 1997: one that ended with fatalities or one that was brought under control before a fatality occurred.

But that part about fatalities brings up another important point: the little message, as it attempts to skewer the media for not reporting the story, fails to mention a few other pertinent facts: that 16-year-old was not stopped in the act. By the time he encountered that gun-toting assistant principal, the teen had already shot two classmates to death, wounded seven others, and had left the school and was in his car attempting to leave the campus. The assistant principal merely prevented his escape from the parking lot, a valuable act, certainly, but not an act that necessarily saved lives. Snopes.com points out that while some speculated that the teen, who’d started his day by killing his mother with a butcher knife then bludgeoning her before bringing his rifle to school, was next headed to a middle school to shoot more kids, no conclusive evidence was presented to confirm this once and for all.

And in comments posted to the original graphic, several claim they remember hearing about the story. One person claimed it was all over the national news at the time. I don’t recall the story specifically, but that hardly means it wasn’t covered. And at this distance, it’s not necessarily easy to find out the extent to which it was covered. I suspect that’s what the originator is, in part, counting on.

If we really want honesty, and if we really want the whole story reported, why would we want to focus on the assistant principal and make absolutely no mention of the nine students wounded by the gunman? Could it be that mentioning those facts doesn’t serve the “agenda” of the people crying “bias”?

I think we all know the answer to that one.

You can’t believe everything you read on the internet. And when you encounter someone screaming bias, the fair thing to do, before spreading the accusations further, is to do a little research to see what the rest of the story actually is.

Leave a Reply

23 Comments on "Media Bias Accusations Don’t Exactly Tell Whole Story"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
spyder
Guest
in 1997 there was less media coverage of these “incidents” probably to keep public panic and outrage down to a minimum. Today the media is nothing but sensationalism with more ways to reach the public. As a result, we have people with their own, country destroying agendas having their say. We also have foreign countries laughing at the USA because we are tearing ourselves apart. We have removed God from our lives and government, we have not outlawed killing babies and even though killing children in a school gets the attention it is the same thing as aborting a child’s… Read more »
Chris
Guest
does anyone think that its possible the 16 year old had enough time to kill those 2 kids and wound 7 others if there had been metal detectors and armed guards too?   Thats what we want – protection.    Also, I’m positive the principal was not allowed to have the gun in the school (causing a clear delay from hearing the shots, to going to get your gun from the parking lot to getting back)  This is the main reason for the conceal and carry.  GUN FREE ZONES don’t work.   Does that not make a difference either ?… Read more »
Carl
Guest
First, I respect your opinion that someone with a gun did not stop a criminal in action; he only caught him after the act. My thought is that no law abiding individual could have stopped him because they would not have had a firearm on school grounds. I do believe that the media is or at least could very easily be biased. My little bit of understanding is that there are fewer main stream media companies but they are larger. If one wanted to pursue an agenda who could dispute it? How much influence does CNN have? I read several… Read more »
Eric
Guest
I guess I might be one of the only ones on here that’s pleased with your analysis of this meme. Just saw it maybe 20 minutes ago on Facebook and came to the same conclusion: He didn’t stop the shooting, he did stop Woodham from escaping after his car was stuck, using a gun to assure compliance. Like you, I do not know this story at all, just did very basic internet search about it to know a bit more, since some guy was making random statements in the comments section on facebook. Trying hard to focus on this individual… Read more »
Jim Hankins
Guest

Hard to mitigate the shooting if the tool to help you is outside in your vehicle.

wpDiscuz