Month Archives: April 2023

When you have a taste for a particular restaurant's food, how much poor fast food service are you willing to tolerate before you stop going?

Think of the TV streaming service you watch most. Now ask yourself what you'd be willing to sacrifice to keep it for a month.

We have all sorts of names for grammatical problems in the English language. But you may never have heard of squinting modifiers!

Days after the National Weather Service issued a warning about weather alerts on Twitter, the social giant seems to have reversed course.

If you are a pet owner and you genuinely love your pet, you probably already have an answer to the question of whether pets go to heaven.

Some viewers hate the laugh track added to sitcoms. But for a show that uses them, a missing laugh track can be even more distracting.

A pair of relatively new gender-neutral terms describe members of the Latin community. But should you go with Latine or Latinx?

Is your blog's web hosting company environmentally friendly? It wouldn't normally occur to me to determine whether I have a 'green website.'

When I first heard of 'cultivated meat,' I wasn't sure what we were talking about. But its proponents say it could help save planet Earth.

When Kid Rock decided to take a stand against Bud Light for their partnership with a transgender woman, he chose a strange brand to embrace.

One of the first things we learned about sentences was to identify the subject and predicate. Then we stopped talking about predicates.

A recent article I found on artificial intelligence suggests there are 14 ways bloggers can use AI. Would any of them work for you?

One thing that royally ticks me off these days is spam. But when I decided to report spam comments to Instagram, things took a weird turn.

I run into some of the goofiest customer service snafus anymore. Take, for example, my recent attempt to purchase a new desk calendar.

A battle is brewing over grammar errors in textbooks. Some say it's more inclusive teaching, but others call it just plain wrong.

After stating it would not pay for Twitter Blue to maintain its verified checkmark, 'The New York Times' was among the first to lose theirs.