Sneaked or Snuck? One’s More Correct Than the Other


The debate of sneaked or snuck has divided grammar enthusiasts for some time, particularly those who insist there can only be one correct choice.

One of my colleagues cringes every time he hears someone use the word snuck as the past tense of sneak. In the debate over sneaked or snuck, his preference is more than clear.

But it’s not as clear for many others, who as enthusiastically maintain snuck is fine.

The past tense of leak is leaked, not luck, but probably only because luck is its own word.

Grammarly, the grammar plugin I use on multiple browsers, addressed the issue on its blog:

Sneaked is the past tense of sneak when the verb is treated like a regular verb.
Snuck is the past tense of sneak when the verb is treated like an irregular verb.

Well that clears it right up, doesn’t it?

No, not for me, either.

The problem is, who gets to decide whether sneak is treated like a regular or an irregular verb? Grammarly points to a similar issue involving the verb dive, which can be expressed in past tense as dived or dove. Both are considered acceptable, although in that case, it seems dove has a little more acceptance than snuck. points out snuck was used as early as the late 1800s, and has become the “standard variant past tense and past participle” of sneak.

It does note, however, that particularly among the British, sneaked is still prefered. My co-worker isn’t British, but on this issue, he might as well be.

Merriam-Webster, meanwhile, points out the mystery of the construction:

Perhaps the most mysterious part of the story of snuck is the question of where it came from. No common verb follows the precise pattern of snuck: the past tense of leak is not luck, of streak is not struck, of creak is not cruck, of peek is not puck.

The form just showed up, it says, and the rest of us (mostly) just accepted it. Except for folks like my colleague.

Five years ago, Brian A. Klems, at Writer’s Digest, predicted that in another 10-20 years, most people would never raise an eyebrow to snuck, but recommended in the meantime that you should go with sneaked instead.

It’ll make you sound smarter, he said.

It’ll also keep folks like my co-worker from coming after you when you least expect it, I’d add.

Does ‘snuck’ bother you or do you accept it as the normal past tense of ‘sneak’?


  1. I’ve mostly used snuck but have used sneaked sometimes as well. I’m an equal opportunity sneaker, I guess! Both words sound okay to me.

  2. I tend to use “snuck” and will probably continue to do so. It just sounds better to me and, since either word is technically correct, I’ll just stick with “snuck”.

    1. Hung vs hanged is an interesting case. Hanged is normally only used for the past tense of putting people to death by hanging them from a rope. Hung is the past tense of other uses of hang; you would not say “John hanged a picture yesterday”. Some people HAVE said “John was hung yesterday” but hanged is the preferred form in that context.

  3. So it IS sneaked, not snuck… very interesting. I hate to admit that for over forty years, I have been using the incorrect word, especially being the British English user that I am! But I just thought it was just one of the far too many “exceptions to the rule” kind of words so prevalent in the English language. Also, too many words that should not have an ”er” appended o them have been making their way into this, which is not the same exact problem, but that grates on me, too.


Leave a Response

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Patrick is a Christian with more than 29 years experience in professional writing, producing and marketing. His professional background also includes social media, reporting for broadcast television and the web, directing, videography and photography. He enjoys getting to know people over coffee and spending time with his dog.